On Thursday, May 01, 2014 01:11:57 PM Stephen Smalley wrote: > I'm fine with it as is. Okay, it's applied to the next branch. > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 09:08:28 AM Stephen Smalley wrote: > >> The revised patch switched from result=allowed|denied to > >> permissive=0|1 in the avc message. I think Bill's point was with > >> respect to the code, which still internally is passing around the > >> result of the decision and inferring the permissive state from it, > >> rather than the output string itself. > > > > I'm fine with this patch, but before I merge it for next I just wanted to > > make sure there isn't another revision coming? > > > > -- > > paul moore > > www.paul-moore.com -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
