On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 08:50:03 AM James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 01:26:40 PM James Morris wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > This issue with the linux-security tree keeps coming up and I stand by > > > > my earlier statements that I would much prefer if the linux-security > > > > is based off the latest kernel release, e.g. 3.13 as of today. This > > > > seems to be in keeping with Linus' comments, fits with what Eric was > > > > doing back when he managed the SELinux tree, and strikes a nice > > > > balance between stability and "newness". I plan on continuing with > > > > this approach for the SELinux tree. > > > > > > > > However, I don't want the 3.15 patches to get lost due to these stupid > > > > differences so I've created a new branch that has the SELinux 3.15 > > > > patches applied on top of linux-security#next. > > > > > > > > * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux next > > > > > > What's the new branch? That seems to be the same. > > > > My mistake, the new branch is "next-jmorris". > > 195 files changed, 1348 insertions(+), 885 deletions(-) It should be more to your liking now. # git pull git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux next-jmorris remote: Counting objects: 15, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (11/11), done. remote: Total 11 (delta 8), reused 0 (delta 0) Unpacking objects: 100% (11/11), done. >From git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux * branch next-jmorris -> FETCH_HEAD Updating 33b2533..f64410e Fast-forward security/selinux/hooks.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
