Why? The SELinux tree should not be rebasing patches or merging random snapshots in Linus' tree... On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:34 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Paul Moore wrote: > >> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 05:04:26 PM Paul Moore wrote: >> > Hi James, >> > >> > Two more small patches for 3.13-rcX. Both fix long standing issues, and >> > both should be very uncontroversial. FYI, I've left my previous sent >> > 3.13-rcX fixes in the tree below, including the revert patch that Linus did >> > himself before it could flow from the SELinux tree. >> > > > Can you make a new branch for me to pull from, based on current Linus? > > > -- > James Morris > <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
