Re: Allow audit2allow to return constraint information from policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> At the end of last year I was complaining about audit2allow and the SELinux
> tools chain not being able to give better information about what constraint is
> being violated, so a admin or policy writer could have a clue on how to fix
> the problem.
> 
> A fairly common problem is domains trying to change the role or user component
> of the label.  Or in the MCS and MLS world, what attribute do I need to add to
> my policy to allow the AVC.
> 
> Richard Haines wrote some nice patches to add the constraint information to
> the kernel and to change user space to reveal this information.
> 
> Sadly we thought these discussions had happened on the list, but I guess we
> had taken it private.  Here is the userspace patch to reveal this information.
> 
> The kernel team will be posting the kernel patch hopefully soon.  We believe
> that even though the kernel does not need the additional information about the
> constraint, the limited space required to carry this information makes sense.
> 


Can we though make that information opt-in

I think it annoying that when i run audit2allow my screen gets filled
with all kinds of information i am not interested in

I could find a option to get rid of the noise


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux