On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > At the end of last year I was complaining about audit2allow and the SELinux > tools chain not being able to give better information about what constraint is > being violated, so a admin or policy writer could have a clue on how to fix > the problem. > > A fairly common problem is domains trying to change the role or user component > of the label. Or in the MCS and MLS world, what attribute do I need to add to > my policy to allow the AVC. > > Richard Haines wrote some nice patches to add the constraint information to > the kernel and to change user space to reveal this information. > > Sadly we thought these discussions had happened on the list, but I guess we > had taken it private. Here is the userspace patch to reveal this information. > > The kernel team will be posting the kernel patch hopefully soon. We believe > that even though the kernel does not need the additional information about the > constraint, the limited space required to carry this information makes sense. > Can we though make that information opt-in I think it annoying that when i run audit2allow my screen gets filled with all kinds of information i am not interested in I could find a option to get rid of the noise -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.