Re: Is this a bug in sesearch, or ...?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/16/2013 03:35 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 12:54 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>> Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> I was explaining the concept of (type) attributes using the domain type
>>> attribute as an example on IRC, and a sharp person embarrassed me by
>>> noting that the following rule returns nothing where he would have
>>> expected something:
>>>
>>> sesearch -A -d -s domain -c process -p fork
>>>
>>> Why does this not return anything? Is is because the target is "self"?
>>
>> "self" is resolved by the compiler, it isn't present in the kernel binary.
>>
>> You specified -d "do not search for type's attributes" and then gave an 
>> attribute as the source. I'm not sure what the intended behavior was but 
>> excluding the -d gave me back a large set of rules.
> 
> The result i expected would have been the exact (direct) rule as
> specified in the policy:
> 
> allow domain self : process fork;
> 
> So not the large list that one gets without the -d option because that
> is not the direct rule

direct means "granted to an individual type, not via attribute".  So it
omits any rules written in terms of attributes.



--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux