On Monday, September 09, 2013 07:35:29 PM Waiman Long wrote: > On 07/23/2013 06:05 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > Just a quick follow-up to let you know that I've rebased the lblnet-next > > tree to Linus' post -rc2 tree from earlier today. I did a quick > > build/boot/test cycle and everything looked sane to me, but additional > > testing is always welcome. > > > > * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_next > > * http://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_next > > Just want to know if you are planning to push those patches into v3.12. You and me both. Your patches, as well as a number of others, should go in via Eric's SELinux tree, not my labeled networking tree; I was simply hosting the patches to get them some exposure in linux-next. A few weeks back Eric merged the patches into his SELinux tree so I dropped them from lblnet-next to prevent conflicts. Eric, push them patches up to James already. It is absolutely ridiculous that we've got bug fixes that have missed *several* kernel releases because you aren't pushing fixes upstream. This is *extremely* frustrating. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
