Some basic simplification and comment reformatting.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/selinux/include/xfrm.h | 17 ++++----
security/selinux/xfrm.c | 85 +++++++++++++++------------------------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
index f2a2314..b463f210 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)
return (atomic_read(&selinux_xfrm_refcount) > 0);
}
-int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad);
-int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto);
+int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad);
+int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto);
int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall);
static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void)
@@ -61,14 +61,15 @@ static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)
return 0;
}
-static inline int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad)
+static inline int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad)
{
return 0;
}
-static inline int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
+static inline int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad,
+ u8 proto)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index 4a7ba4a..1f6c6e6 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -367,14 +367,12 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
* we need to check for unlabelled access since this may not have
* gone thru the IPSec process.
*/
-int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad)
+int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad)
{
- int i, rc = 0;
- struct sec_path *sp;
- u32 sel_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
-
- sp = skb->sp;
+ int i;
+ struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp;
+ u32 peer_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
if (sp) {
for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++) {
@@ -382,23 +380,17 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
- sel_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
+ peer_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
break;
}
}
}
- /*
- * This check even when there's no association involved is
- * intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
- * process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
- * explicitly allowed by policy.
- */
-
- rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, sel_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
- ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
-
- return rc;
+ /* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
+ * according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
+ * non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
+ return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
+ SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
}
/*
@@ -408,49 +400,38 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
* If we do have a authorizable security association, then it has already been
* checked in the selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook above.
*/
-int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
+int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
{
struct dst_entry *dst;
- int rc = 0;
-
- dst = skb_dst(skb);
-
- if (dst) {
- struct dst_entry *dst_test;
-
- for (dst_test = dst; dst_test != NULL;
- dst_test = dst_test->child) {
- struct xfrm_state *x = dst_test->xfrm;
-
- if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
- goto out;
- }
- }
switch (proto) {
case IPPROTO_AH:
case IPPROTO_ESP:
case IPPROTO_COMP:
- /*
- * We should have already seen this packet once before
- * it underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the
- * unlabeled check.
- */
- goto out;
+ /* We should have already seen this packet once before it
+ * underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the unlabeled
+ * check. */
+ return 0;
default:
break;
}
- /*
- * This check even when there's no association involved is
- * intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
- * process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
- * explicitly allowed by policy.
- */
+ dst = skb_dst(skb);
+ if (dst) {
+ struct dst_entry *iter;
- rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
- ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
-out:
- return rc;
+ for (iter = dst; iter != NULL; iter = iter->child) {
+ struct xfrm_state *x = iter->xfrm;
+
+ if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
+ * according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
+ * non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
+ return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
+ SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
}
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
