On Friday, May 31, 2013 05:31:08 PM David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:36:18 -0400 > > > Take #3 ... two changes here: the first is a simple reordering of the > > two patches and the second is stripping the SELinux patch (2/2 in this > > patchset) of everything but the bare bones changes needed to fix the > > problem in the 3.10-rcX tree. > > Series applied, but longer term I'd like to see this handled by generation > counts or similar during lookup time. > > Doing a GC every policy delete hurts policy delete performance, something > we worked really hard to make as light weight as possible given the > constraints. Thanks for pulling in the fixes for 3.10-rcX. I promise to take a look at changing our approach to detecting an active labeled IPsec configuration for future releases. I need to cleanup our labeled IPsec code anyway, it is in need of some TLC (you saw some of the changes in the earlier version of this patchset). -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
