On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 05:43:08 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 4/24/2013 4:00 PM, John Johansen wrote: > > On 04/24/2013 02:15 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > >> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 01:22:20 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: ... > >>> An interesting aside that may be relevant is that the error > >>> condition behavior makes it advisable to have the LSM you care > >>> about most go last. If the networking components were strictly > >>> FCFS you might have to chose an ordering you might not want for > >>> other reasons. > >> > >> Well, maybe not ... I think. If we take a FCFS approach to the network > >> controls then only one LSM is really ever going to throw an error on the > >> network hooks, yes? > > You set up the order you want to get the networking handled > correctly and you could get filesystem hooks in the wrong order. > Not that that really ought to be a problem, but there are wonky > admin tools out there. I don't quite follow; can you be a bit more explicit about getting the filesystem hooks in the wrong order? > >> I'm still in favor of assigning the network hooks to the LSM at boot > >> based on the "security=" configuration. > > > > yeah dealing with selection at boot time is going to be needed > > at some point, whether its now or later ... > > I'll have a go at it then. What that would mean is that: > > security=smack,selinux > > gives Smack NetLabel and SELinux xfrm and secmark while > > security=selinux,smack > > gives SELinux all three. That seems reasonable, it also keeps the door open for adding a specific network hook ordering option, e.g. "security_net=", at a later date if necessary. > I would still like it to be possible to explicitly configure the allocation > at build time. I suppose I have no object to that, I would just place my vote to have the dynamic FCFS (or LCFS if that makes more sense) assignment be the Kconfig default. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
