Re: [PATCH v10] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Casey Schaufler wrote:

>>       /proc/.../attr/current
>>       /proc/.../attr/selinux.current
>>       /proc/.../attr/apparmor.current
>>       /proc/.../attr/keycreate
>>       /proc/.../attr/selinux.keycreate
>>

> Can we use prctl() interface instead of /proc/$pid/attr/$lsmname.$type ?
> I simply don't want to see flood of entries when "find /proc/" runs. ;-)
>
> prctl() can tell the caller whether specified LSM is enabled/presented or not
> via its return value.

I don't much care for or understand Casey's reason for using selinux.*
instead of selinux/* but at least it means we can interact with these
interfaces in a shell.  prctl() means you can't use tools like cat or
echo.  Everything has to be a utility.  That just does not seem as
nice for admins.

In my opinion you want to do things pragmatically, use a library, and
if you want to do things as a human, use the tools that already exist.

-Eric

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux