On Monday, December 10, 2012 01:42:12 PM Eric Paris wrote: > Let me abstract a little here Paul. Lets say user A starts an > unclassified process and a top secret process. SELinux policy darn > well better be able to enforce that they can not attach to the same > tun. > > Am I missing something here? Relax, all the SELinux enforced separation still exists, and works. We're just fixing the LSM/SELinux stuff that was broken with the multiqueue addition and adding a new SELinux permission to control access to the new queue command. What we are currently discussing is DAC only. While Michael have different opinions on how to solve the DAC issues, we agree that SELinux works correctly. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
