On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 15:22 +0100, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had created a policy for PowerDNS (pdns package in Fedora), but after
> e-mailing with dwalsh he told me it might be better to just adapt the
> named policy a bit. Here is what I have so far:
> ======pdns.fc======
> /usr/sbin/pdns_server -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:named_exec_t,s0)
> /etc/pdns/pdns.conf -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:named_conf_t,s0)
> /var/run/pdns.controlsocket -s
> gen_context(system_u:object_r:named_var_run_t,s0)
> /var/run/pdns.pid -- gen_context(system_u:object_r:named_var_run_t,s0)
escape the periods here though to minimize chances of error
> ===================
> ======pdns.te======
> policy_module(pdns,0.0.1)
>
> require{
> type named_t;
> }
>
> #gmysql backend:
> bool pdns_can_connect_db true;
> tunable_policy(`pdns_backend_mysql', `
> mysql_read_config(named_t)
> #socket
> mysql_stream_connect(named_t)
> ')
> ===================
> With this added pdns works with both the bind-backend and the
> mysql-backend (pdns-backend-mysql in Fedora). I do still get some
> denials, first 2 with both backends:
> type=AVC msg=audit(12/03/2012 14:30:26.767:597) : avc: denied { fsetid
> } for pid=23063 comm=pdns_server capability=fsetid
> scontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 tclass=capability
>
> type=AVC msg=audit(12/03/2012 14:30:26.735:595) : avc: denied { kill }
> for pid=20597 comm=pdns_server capability=kill
> scontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 tclass=capability
>
> For this I can add:
> allow named_t self:capability { fsetid kill };
> but I am not sure if that is okay, can anyone please advise?
>
> Last one I get with the mysql backend:
> type=AVC msg=audit(12/03/2012 13:37:52.315:545) : avc: denied {
> getattr } for pid=20772 comm=pdns_server
> path=/usr/share/mysql/charsets/Index.xml dev="dm-0" ino=8936
> scontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 tclass=file
> To allow this I will have to allow read access from named_t to usr_t,
> would that be okay?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Sander
>
> --
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
