Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 There are
>    cases where the existing LSMs wanted the call
>    last, and those have been addressed as well.

Is this just SELinux and mmap_min_addr?  I didn't look at the code,
but if this make it any better or worse, you can reverse them.  We
don't have some requirement to audit it, I just thought it was a good
idea and don't much care if you revert to 'normal'

-Eric

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux