-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2012 04:18 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 04:19:32 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: >> Is the "<<none>>" check needed at all? This has bothered me for a while, >> and it's not clear if calling lsetfilecon_raw() with that would DTRT, or >> if selabel_lookup_raw() would never return that to start with. > > Oh, rechecking now selabel_file(5) it seems like selabel_lookup_raw() might > never return "<<none>>", so I've preventively removed locally that check > now. > > thanks, guillem > > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing > list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to > majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes > as the message. > I don't agree that matchpatchcon is obsoleted, I see it as more of a helper function. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCg868ACgkQrlYvE4MpobMw/wCdEFI4dQvsWXk/Lc0sNuPbM4Sd xyYAnAzG9LYOGg9811tEjpUITij1SF8D =s8TS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
