On 08/20/12 15:07, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> In Gentoo, I had to patch the setools package' swig interfaces to build with
> the swig-2.0.7 (and probably a few previous ones, version 2.0.4 still seemed
> to build the code properly). The patch is fairly large (228 KiB) so I've put
> it online for now. However, I'm not sure if this is the right way to fix
> things or not.
>
> In any case, the build failures we got were:
>
> ../qpol.i:241: Warning 504: Function qpol_module::qpol_module_t(char const
> *) must have a return type. Ignored.
> ../qpol.i:244: Warning 521: Illegal destructor name
> qpol_module::~qpol_module_t(). Ignored.
>
> and
>
> qpol_wrap.c:1831:24: error: conflicting types for qpol_module_get_path
> ../../../libqpol/include/qpol/module.h:69:13: note: previous declaration of qpol_module_get_path was here
> qpol_wrap.c: In function qpol_module_get_path:
> qpol_wrap.c:1834:3: error: too many arguments to function qpol_module_get_path
> qpol_wrap.c:1831:24: note: declared here
>
> I fixed it by changing the constructors/destructor names to the struct name
> (as in "typedef struct qpol_module {} qpol_module_t" so the
> constructur/destructor uses "qpol_module" rather than "qpol_module_t", and
> by introducing %rename() calls for each collision found during the build
> process.
>
> The patch is at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/patches/0008-fix_swig_build_failures_bug_430262.patch
>
> If it is the right patch, I hope this saves a few hours of work for the
> other developers ;-)
I think this can be merged, but I'd need an update to the configure script to check for swig 2.0.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
