Re: [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm going to work right now on exposing the equivalent struct sock LSM
> interface so we can call that as well.  But it's going to take me a
> bit.

Before you go too far down this path, can you elaborate on what
exactly you mean by the above?

I'm asking because I'm not convinced the labeling, either the old way
or the new way, was 100% correct and I think we're going to need to
change things regardless.  I'm just not sure what the right solution
is just yet.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux