On 07/25/2012 10:38 PM, William Roberts wrote: > From: William Roberts <bill.c.roberts@xxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes build bug > security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S:95: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `smc #0' > > Signed-off-by: William Roberts <w.roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S b/security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S > index 30b8b35..e433380 100644 > --- a/security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S > +++ b/security/smc/bridge_pub2sec.S > @@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ return_from_irq: > b label_smc > > label_smc: > - .arch_extension sec > +#if __GNUC__ >= 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6 Should the ".arch_extension sec" line be present when compiling with some future compiler (eg. 5.1)? If so then this condition is not correct because it will not be met if the major number is greater than 4 and minor number is lower than 6 (eg. version 5.1). I do not know the proper syntax but the condition should look something like this: #if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6) > + .arch_extension sec > +#endif > INVALIDATE_BTB > dsb > dmb -- Michal Mašek -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
