On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:38 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > No, libsepol isn't supposed to call libselinux. Tools like checkpolicy > that call libsepol need to work even on non-SELinux (and even non-Linux) > platforms. Agreed alternate names should be a first class citizen and part of policy proper. I'm trying to decide if we should move the get/set translator to load the policydb and find alternates that way or should we generate the alternate names as a file at build time and use that small translation file (like we tried today)? -Eric -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
