On 10/12/11 10:15, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 10/12/2011 09:40 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: >> On 10/07/11 14:24, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> Right now, every domain that transitions to another domain gets >>> the following rule written. >>> >>> dontaudit SOURCE TARGET : process { noatsecure siginh rlimitinh } >>> ; >>> >>> In Fedora 17 policy right now we have 2152 rules, out of >>> Dontaudit: 9415 >>> >>> >>> sesearch --dontaudit -p noatsecure | wc -l 2152 >>> >>> We could rewrite this with one rule. >>> >>> dontaudit domain domain:process { noatsecure siginh rlimitinh } >>> ; >>> >>> Of course this is more lenient then what we have now, although >>> since it is dontaudit rules, not sure it matters. >>> >>> Comments? > >> I'm on the fence. On one hand, I hate to overspecify the policy, >> but on the other hand, these perms can only be hit on a domain >> transition. How much does this save? > > > 2000/90000 > > 2% of the size of policy. Based on my test of all Refpolicy modules compiled in, the size went from 4687381 to 4667101, a 20kB difference. If someone was trying to squeeze everything out for an embedded system policy, I could see this change, but otherwise, it doesn't seem very compelling. -- Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.