On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:41 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:13 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:16 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > From 1268e66e94286a55c399383d5959734d3597792d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:54:25 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH 11/67] policycoreutils: setfiles: FIXME switch from > > > stat to > > > stat64 > > > > > > This looks bad. glibc takes care of this. We should do send this > > > upstream but I would like to know why you did it in Fedora.... > > > > > > NOT-Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > policycoreutils/setfiles/restore.c | 8 ++++---- > > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Perhaps you could exploit a few #ifdef's here ? > > > > Such as _LARGEFILE_SOURCE _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE and/or > > _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 ? > > > > More available from: > > > > info libc 'Feature Test Macros' > > We were doing that before converting setfiles from using nftw(3) to > using fts(3) for the file tree walk. But fts.h has this gem: > /* The fts interface is incompatible with the LFS interface which > transparently uses the 64-bit file access functions. */ > #ifdef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 > # error "<fts.h> cannot be used with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS==64" > #endif That must be the reason why other projects are moving in the opposite direction, see for example: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3126942&group_id=3382&atid=103382 Guido -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
