Re: [v0 PATCH 6/6] Skip tunable identifier and cond_node_t in expansion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HarryCiao wrote:
<snip>
> The implementation of the save-linked option has no idea about the effort to 
> separate tunables from booleans, so I am afraid it won't help much.
> 

I'm not sure about this. The linked policy should have everything that the
original modules had, with only the value mapping changed. The expansion is
where things get removed. This behavior should not change for a variety of
reasons, including the ability to do a full semantic analysis of the linked policy.

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux