On Thursday, April 28, 2011 01:26:43 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 4/27/2011 5:34 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > The SMACK label of new file descriptors is obtained from the credentials
> > set in the 'f_cred' field of the same structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > index c6f8fca..e3c9e54 100644
> > --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> > @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static int smack_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
> > */
> > static int smack_file_alloc_security(struct file *file)
> > {
> > - file->f_security = smk_of_current();
> > + file->f_security = smk_of_task(file->f_cred->security);
>
> Now hang on. This just looks wrong. You're setting the value of one
> field of the file structure to another value in the same file structure.
> I don't see that this is what I want.
>
Hi Casey
thanks for the review.
The field 'f_cred' stores the credentials of the subject that issued the open.
The first patch allows to set this field with the credentials provided to
the function get_empty_filp() which may be those of the 'current'
process as in the original case, or those provided by a kernel service that
called the function dentry_open() directly.
Roberto Sassu
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
