|
> Subject: RE: [v0 PATCH 1/3] SELinux: Add class support to the role_trans structure > From: sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: harrytaurus2002@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: eparis@xxxxxxxxxx; qingtao.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jmorris@xxxxxxxxx; eparis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:21:01 -0400 > > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 09:43 +0000, HarryCiao wrote: > > > Why "cclass"? most of the code uses tclass (which might mean 'target > > > class' but I'm not sure) > > > > Well, I intended to use "class" but it is a reserved GCC identifier. > > > > The class could be the subject class, that is, the "process" class, or > > could be the newly object class, so tclass(target class) won't fit > > much here. > > > > I will update it to "classes" which I think will be better than > > "cclass" :-) > > tclass is more consist! ent with existing code, and it does mean "target > class", where target can be a subject or an object. Sure, I will correct it in the v2 patches. Thanks! Harry > > -- > Stephen Smalley > National Security Agency > > > -- > This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. > If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. |
