[PATCH] Revert "selinux: simplify ioctl checking"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This reverts commit 242631c49d4cf39642741d6627750151b058233b.

Conflicts:

	security/selinux/hooks.c

SELinux used to recognize certain individual ioctls and check
permissions based on the knowledge of the individual ioctl.  In commit
242631c49d4cf396 the SELinux code stopped trying to understand
individual ioctls and to instead looked at the ioctl access bits to
determine in we should check read or write for that operation.  This
same suggestion was made to SMACK (and I believe copied into TOMOYO).
But this suggestion is total rubbish.  The ioctl access bits are
actually the access requirements for the structure being passed into the
ioctl, and are completely unrelated to the operation of the ioctl or the
object the ioctl is being performed upon.

Take FS_IOC_FIEMAP as an example.  FS_IOC_FIEMAP is defined as:

FS_IOC_FIEMAP _IOWR('f', 11, struct fiemap)

So it has access bits R and W.  What this really means is that the
kernel is going to both read and write to the struct fiemap.  It has
nothing at all to do with the operations that this ioctl might perform
on the file itself!

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 security/selinux/hooks.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 8cc5359..5e6b46a 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kd.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/tracehook.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/ext2_fs.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/xattr.h>
@@ -36,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
@@ -2860,16 +2863,47 @@ static int selinux_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 			      unsigned long arg)
 {
 	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
-	u32 av = 0;
+	int error = 0;
 
-	if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) & _IOC_WRITE)
-		av |= FILE__WRITE;
-	if (_IOC_DIR(cmd) & _IOC_READ)
-		av |= FILE__READ;
-	if (!av)
-		av = FILE__IOCTL;
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case FIONREAD:
+	/* fall through */
+	case FIBMAP:
+	/* fall through */
+	case FIGETBSZ:
+	/* fall through */
+	case EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS:
+	/* fall through */
+	case EXT2_IOC_GETVERSION:
+		error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__GETATTR);
+		break;
+
+	case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS:
+	/* fall through */
+	case EXT2_IOC_SETVERSION:
+		error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__SETATTR);
+		break;
 
-	return file_has_perm(cred, file, av);
+	/* sys_ioctl() checks */
+	case FIONBIO:
+	/* fall through */
+	case FIOASYNC:
+		error = file_has_perm(cred, file, 0);
+		break;
+
+	case KDSKBENT:
+	case KDSKBSENT:
+		error = task_has_capability(current, cred, CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG,
+					    SECURITY_CAP_AUDIT);
+		break;
+
+	/* default case assumes that the command will go
+	 * to the file's ioctl() function.
+	 */
+	default:
+		error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__IOCTL);
+	}
+	return error;
 }
 
 static int default_noexec;


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux