On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 04:44 PM, Qwyjibo Jones wrote:
> I don't seem to have the "allow_sysadm_manage_security" boolean. Do I
> need to create it somehow and put it under /selinux/booleans ?
>
> # getsebool -a | grep allow_sysadm_manage_security
> # getsebool -a | grep allow_sysadm
> # getsebool -a | grep sysadm
> allow_httpd_sysadm_script_anon_write --> off
> ssh_sysadm_login --> off
> staff_read_sysadm_file --> off
> xdm_sysadm_login --> off
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx
Oops I misread the policy, I guess we abandoned the separation.> On 01/18/2011 01:03 PM, Qwyjibo Jones wrote:
>
>> I am currently working with an Itanium2 system which has RHEL 5.3 MLS
>> installed.
>> I am trying to understand how separation of roles works in SELinux/MLS
>> policy version 21. We have been told that we need to separate
> roles that
>> the sys admin is no longer allowed to do.
>
>> After reading through these threads, in the archives I am still
>> wondering about a couple things:
>
>
> http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/list-archive/0504/thread_body66.shtml#11082
>
>> And this one:
>
> http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/list-archive/0802/thread_body60.shtml
>
>> 1) Is the RHEL 5.x MLS policy version 21 capable of the following
>> separation of sysadm_r and secadm_r roles:
>
>> a) Can the secadm_r role be the only role that can assign roles via
>> semanage?
>
>> c) Can the secadm_r role be the only role that can control
> files used
>> in auditing, like auditd.conf. audit.rules, /etc/init.d/auditd etc...
>
> auditadm_r:auditadm_t is only allowed to modify these files.
>
>> 2) Is this better accomplished with a combination of SUDO and SELinux?
> Since sysadm_t can hack his way around the SELinux controls via tools
> like rpm and fdisk, you are better off using sudo to further restrict
> his actions, if possible.
>> 3) How can I determine what secadm_r can do in the current
>> configuration? can any of the CLI tools show me that? ( no gui tools
>> available )
>
> You probably want to look at secadm_t
>
> sesearch -A -t secadm_t
>
>> If not, what about RHEL 6 ? ( I understand RHEL 6 is not available to
>> Itanium systems, but we may have new hardware soon)
>
>> Any tips. hints, pointers etc... would be very helpfull.
>
>> Thanks for your time,
>
ifdef(`enable_mls',`
userdom_security_administrator(secadm_t,secadm_r,{
secadm_tty_device_t sysadm_devpts_t })
# tunable_policy(`allow_sysadm_manage_security',`
userdom_security_administrator(sysadm_t,sysadm_r,admin_terminal)
# ')
Missed the "#" at the beginning of the lines. So I don't think we
prevent sysadm_t from managing the security, of course he has to be able
to run at SystemHigh.
iEYEARECAAYFAk03XOYACgkQrlYvE4MpobNWvACeO1Q8Rioee4mA8jHSUKWyDFkI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
hHgAn2hf4+hRA36bn2urfI3ezlKNK/+O
=h3mZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
