On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 19:24 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On 12/10/10 18:26, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 2010-10-12 17:40, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> static struct xt_target secmark_tg_reg __read_mostly = {
> >> - .name = "SECMARK",
> >> - .revision = 0,
> >> - .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
> >> - .checkentry = secmark_tg_check,
> >> - .destroy = secmark_tg_destroy,
> >> - .target = secmark_tg,
> >> - .targetsize = sizeof(struct xt_secmark_target_info),
> >> - .me = THIS_MODULE,
> >> + .name = "SECMARK",
> >> + .revision = 0,
> >> + .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
> >> + .checkentry = secmark_tg_check,
> >> + .destroy = secmark_tg_destroy,
> >> + .target = secmark_tg,
> >> + .targetsize = sizeof(struct xt_secmark_target_info),
> >> + .me = THIS_MODULE,
> >> };
>
> I think that we don't need that extra tab above.
Are you saying that you prefer lots of spaces to get alignment rather
than the single tab? I see examples of both in other struct xt_target
definitions. I didn't make any syntax changes to this struct, so my
guess is that I made this change when I discovered eight spaces in a row
as I was checking the file for tab->space screw-ups before submission.
Since this is a whitespace change in the middle of a real patch I guess
I can drop the hunk entirely if that's what you are asking for....
-Eric
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
