On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 13:55 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Eric Paris wrote: > > > Getting and putting arrays of pointers with flex arrays is a PITA. You > > have to remember to pass &ptr to the _put and you have to do weird and > > wacky casting to get the ptr back from the _get. Add two functions > > flex_array_get_ptr() and flex_array_put_ptr() to handle all of the magic. > > > > There's no code currently in the tree that uses the flex array interface, > so is this something that you've encountered in practice or only by > inspection? If it's the former, is that code on its way for 2.6.36? I did decide to use flex_arrays on code intended for .36 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6371dcd36f649d9d07823f31400618155a20dde1 > I'm hoping distros aren't creating internal dependencies on this interface > that could practically be removed from upstream at any time given its lack > of popularity. I've got some more patches that I'm looking towards .37 which would use the _ptr helpers I suggested: http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=128086475312322&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=128086558513723&w=2 -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.