Re: clamav RWX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If I can change the mapping from RW <-> RX, then the mapping is
> writable only for a brief period (DB reload), so an exploit can't take
> advantage of the RWX mapping (since there is no RWX mapping).
> Thats better than allowing 'execmem' for the entire process, isn't it?

That sounds like a good benefit.

-- 
russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://etbe.coker.com.au/          My Main Blog
http://doc.coker.com.au/           My Documents Blog


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux