Re: clamav RWX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Török Edwin <edwintorok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So if I map a tempfile as RW, write my JITed code to it, then mprotect
> to RX will it work without 'execmem'?

In this case I think that there are two viable options.  One is to prevent 
execmem for both freshclam_t and clamd_t and have them both interpret the 
data, a performance cost for a security benefit.  The other is to allow them 
both execmem access for best performance.  I have already submitted a patch to 
the policy list to implement this.

-- 
russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://etbe.coker.com.au/          My Main Blog
http://doc.coker.com.au/           My Documents Blog


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux