On Monday, June 21, 2010 02:32:53 pm Paul Moore wrote: > On Saturday, May 29, 2010 05:53:16 pm Paul Moore wrote: > > I finally got a chance to cobble together some tests to verify both > > getpeercon() on the client end of a connected UNIX domain socket as well > > as the proper operation of fsetxattr() on sockets. I'm happy to report > > that everything worked as I expected it to (UNIX sockets now behave like > > INET sockets) and nothing exploded. This latest version of the patchset > > should include all the feedback I've received so far as well as my > > sign-off on each patch so I think we should be in good shape at this > > point. As a result, I'm submitting these patches for whatever kernel > > release looks most appropriate - maybe to late for .35, but you might > > be able to make a weak argument that some of the patches are > > bugfixes - regardless, I'll let you guys make that call; as long as > > they go somewhere I'll be happy. > > > > For those of you using git, you can also find a copy of the patches at > > the URL below. > > > > * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing > > Just a quick follow-up for the archives ... James has merged patches 2 > through 6 with patch 1 being intentionally excluded due to concerns from > Stephan Smalley over the potential race conditions described in the > comments. My apologies, that would be _Stephen_ Smalley and not his evil twin Stephan ;) -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
