Re: policycoreutils, sepolgen (sepolgen-ifgen) issues on Debian

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/13/2010 03:11 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:10 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/16/2009 11:01 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 17 2009, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 11:50 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 14 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>          I am running into an issue with sepolgen on Debian. Debian
>>>>>>> ships
>>>>>>>   more than one  version of the refpolicy, a default one, and a
>>>>>>>   MLS enabled one. So, the include files live in either
>>>>>>>   /usr/share/selinux/{default,mls}/include
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          sepolgen (in src/sepolgen/defaults.py) sets
>>>>>>> refpolicy_devel() to
>>>>>>>   a single location -- and thus, only one version of the security
>>>>>>> policy
>>>>>>>   may be supported. So, sepolgen-ifgen from policycoreutils can
>>>>>>> only work
>>>>>>>   with one policy, which may not be the one installed on the target
>>>>>>>   machine. Could this be made configurable, somehow? As far as I can
>>>>>>>   see, sepolgen's python library does not offer any way to set the
>>>>>>> value.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          It would be nice if the location of the include directory
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>   be looked for from a PATH like variable setting, to make it
>>>>>>> easier for
>>>>>>>   distributions to ship more than one policy, or for end users to
>>>>>>>   experiment with other policies without have to overwrite the single
>>>>>>>   default.
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>          Well, here is a kind of proof-of-concept patch (python is
>>>>>> not my
>>>>>>   strong suit), and I have only tested in that it allows the package to
>>>>>>   compile, and the following code works:
>>>>>>        
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>     
>>>>>>   def refpolicy_makefile():
>>>>>> -    return refpolicy_devel() + "/Makefile"
>>>>>> +    chooser = PathChoooser("/etc/selinux/sepolgen.conf")
>>>>>> +    return chooser("Makefile")
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   def headers():
>>>>>> -    return refpolicy_devel() + "/include"
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> +    chooser = PathChoooser("/etc/selinux/sepolgen.conf")
>>>>>> +    return chooser("include")
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>        
>>>>> Why are you making another config file rather than just get the policy
>>>>> name from /etc/selinux/config via selinux_getpolicytype()?
>>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>          This will work well for Debian, since the development files are
>>>>   installed under "/usr/share/selinux/" in a subdirectory named after the
>>>>   policy. I was not sure that this convention was followed in other
>>>>   distributions, though. While I am not certain, google implies that in
>>>>   fedora policy type is targeted, but the devel files do not live in
>>>>   /usr/share/selinux/targeted.[0]. Given that, perhaps it is better to
>>>>   let the user provide guidance about how to map the policy type to a
>>>>   directory?
>>>>
>>>>          Also, I must confess I had forgotten about this call.
>>>>
>>>>          However, a patch with this is trivial, so an alternate patch
>>>>   follows. (Not sure this will work for fedora, so caveat emptor)
>>>>
>>>>          manoj
>>>> [0]
>>>> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/selinux-user-guide/f11/en-US/chap-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Working_with_SELinux.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>>
>>>> If the user installs a policy whose development files do not live under
>>>> /usr/share/selinux/devel/include, sepolgen wqould not work. Debian, for
>>>> instance, installs under:
>>>> /usr/share/selinux/{default,mls}/include
>>>>
>>>> This patch uses selinux_getpolicytype() to determine the policy type, and
>>>> assumes that there is one-on-one correspondence between policytype and
>>>> the directory the development files live in.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Manoj Srivastava<srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>   src/sepolgen/defaults.py |    4 +++-
>>>>   src/sepolgen/module.py   |    2 +-
>>>>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/sepolgen/defaults.py b/src/sepolgen/defaults.py
>>>> index 45ce61a..85e5fb0 100644
>>>> --- a/src/sepolgen/defaults.py
>>>> +++ b/src/sepolgen/defaults.py
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>>>>   Various default settings, including file and directory locations.
>>>>   """
>>>>
>>>> +import selinux
>>>> +
>>>>   def data_dir():
>>>>       return "/var/lib/sepolgen"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -31,7 +33,7 @@ def interface_info():
>>>>       return data_dir() + "/interface_info"
>>>>
>>>>   def refpolicy_devel():
>>>> -    return "/usr/share/selinux/devel"
>>>> +    return "/usr/share/selinux/" + selinux.selinux_getpolicytype()[1]
>>>>
>>>>   def refpolicy_makefile():
>>>>       return refpolicy_devel() + "/Makefile"
>>>> diff --git a/src/sepolgen/module.py b/src/sepolgen/module.py
>>>> index edd24c6..355c9b8 100644
>>>> --- a/src/sepolgen/module.py
>>>> +++ b/src/sepolgen/module.py
>>>> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ class ModuleCompiler:
>>>>           self.semodule_package = "/usr/bin/semodule_package"
>>>>           self.output = output
>>>>           self.last_output = ""
>>>> -        self.refpol_makefile = "/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile"
>>>> +        self.refpol_makefile = "/usr/share/selinux/" +
>>>> selinux.selinux_getpolicytype()[1]  + "/Makefile"
>>>>           self.make = "/usr/bin/make"
>>>>
>>>>       def o(self, str):
>>>>    
>>>
>>> This will break Fedora/RHEL AFAIK. I don't necessarily like that RH has
>>> interface files in /usr/share/selinux/devel rather than
>>> /usr/share/selinux/<policy>/devel or similar but we can't break them.
>>>
>>> Dan, any chance you could change the location of the interface files?
>>>
>>>
>> We could carry a patch although I don't think anyone is  shipping different interfaces for different policies.
>>
>> We could add a link in each policy types back to the devel environment.
>> Or do /usr/share/selinux/POLICYTYPE/devel/Makefile and on RHEL and Fedora systems
>>  have /usr/share/selinux/POLICYTYPE/devel -> /usr/share/selinux/devel/
> 
> I don't think this change ever happened in Fedora (and thus not in
> RHEL-6).
> 
If you make the change, I will just symlink it back to the base package.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvsT9YACgkQrlYvE4MpobNsJwCfW6Zamdh20FVaL84rCpLfUeUY
aBcAoNJlcUvKoCsGRvTo140g/s0hhcMM
=7OGi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux