SECMARK: implementation question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear All,

If I understand correctly, the permission check for inbound packet (the "packet recv" operation) is performed by selinux_socket_sock_recv_skb, which hooks into the socket_sock_recv_skb hook.

Does anybody remember the rationale for doing the check there instead of the NF_INET_LOCAL_IN hook ?

I am asking that because the permission for outbound packets ("packet send") seems to be performed in the NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT. I am sure there should be a good reason for this asymetry, but I don't get it.

Thanks for your time,
Jacques Thomas

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux