On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 08:32 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 07:46 +1000, James Morris wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > > > > Does anyone think we still need to support policy versions < > > > POLICYDB_VERSION_NLCLASS (18)? If not, then we can just drop the > > > dynamic remapping of netlink classes in the security server: > > > if (policydb_loaded_version < POLICYDB_VERSION_NLCLASS) > > > if (tclass >= SECCLASS_NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET && > > > tclass <= SECCLASS_NETLINK_DNRT_SOCKET) > > > tclass = SECCLASS_NETLINK_SOCKET; > > > > > > I think RHEL4 shipped with policy.18. > > > > Was any distro shipped with a lower policy version? If not, then I think > > it should be ok. > > policy.18 was first supported by Linux 2.6.8. > I think the only distro to ship with SELinux enabled and Linux < 2.6.8 > would have been Fedora Core 2, which is long since EOL'd and even akpm > doesn't run it anymore. Not sure about Hardened Gentoo - Chris and/or > Joshua? No objection here. Gentoo has several kernels, but none that old. -- Chris PeBenito <pebenito@xxxxxxxxxx> Developer, Hardened Gentoo Linux Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE6AF9243 Key fingerprint = B0E6 877A 883F A57A 8E6A CB00 BC8E E42D E6AF 9243 -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
