On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 08:30 -0400, Chris PeBenito wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:20 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:40:56 +0200 > > > > > > > Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attached is a new policy for the dkim-filter application. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris, is the policy OK/ready for merge? > > > Tested attached policy again on CentOS 5.3 with strict policy. > > It looks ok. However I'm starting to get concerned about the milter > module getting big. If you want, say the spamassassin milter, you add > the milter module... but then you get rules for a several other milters > too. Yeah thought about that too. A quick fix would be to surround the milter modules with booleans but I don't really like this idea. Another solution would be to split the milter.te into several sub modules. Any other thoughts? -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
