Re: Patch to semanage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/19/09 3:20 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 08/19/2009 09:53 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> On 08/18/2009 05:41 PM, Chad Sellers wrote:
>>>> On 8/18/09 5:35 PM, "Daniel J Walsh"<dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 08/17/2009 05:45 PM, Chad Sellers wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/17/09 6:10 AM, "Daniel J Walsh"<dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ok lets try the patch again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Added equal patch (spelled correctly.)
>>>>>>> Beginning to add modules support to consolidate on one management
>>>>>>> command.
>>>>>>> Eventually replace semodule/setsebool with semanage command.
>>>>>>> Some white space fixing in seobject.py
>>>>>> As I said previously, I've split this patch into the 3 separate
>>>>>> patches
>>>>>> (whitespace, equal, modules) for review purposes, as it was too
>>>>>> difficult to
>>>>>> get through with the 3 different patches interspersed. Please try
>>>>>> to split
>>>>>> up functional patches in the future.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This message will apply to the modules patch only.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> diff --git a/policycoreutils/semanage/semanage
>>>>>>> b/policycoreutils/semanage/semanage
>>>>>>> index 1688d85..072453d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/policycoreutils/semanage/semanage
>>>>>>> +++ b/policycoreutils/semanage/semanage
>>>>>>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
>>>>>>>                  text = _("""
>>>>>>>   semanage [ -S store ] -i [ input_file | - ]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -semanage
>>>>>>> {boolean|login|user|port|interface|node|fcontext|translation}
>>>>>>> -{l|D}
>>>>>>> [-n]
>>>>>>> +semanage
>>>>>>> {module,boolean|login|user|port|interface|node|fcontext|translation}
>>>>>>> -{l|D} [-n]
>>>>>>>   semanage login -{a|d|m} [-sr] login_name | %groupname
>>>>>>>   semanage user -{a|d|m} [-LrRP] selinux_name
>>>>>>>   semanage port -{a|d|m} [-tr] [ -p proto ] port | port_range
>>>>>>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ semanage node -{a|d|m} [-tr] [ -p protocol ] [-M
>>>>>>> netmask]
>>>>>>> addr
>>>>>>>   semanage fcontext -{a|d|m} [-frst] [-e path ] file_spec
>>>>>>>   semanage translation -{a|d|m} [-T] level
>>>>>>>   semanage boolean -{d|m} [--on|--off|-1|-0] -F boolean |
>>>>>>> boolean_file
>>>>>>> -semanage permissive -{d|a} type
>>>>>>> +semanage permissive -{a|d} type
>>>>>>> +semanage module -{a|d|} module
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Primary Options:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ Primary Options:
>>>>>>>       -h, --help       Display this message
>>>>>>>       -n, --noheading  Do not print heading when listing OBJECTS
>>>>>>>           -S, --store      Select and alternate SELinux store to
>>>>>>> manage
>>>>>>> +        --dontaudit      Turn on or off dontaudit rules
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Need to specify that this takes an integer argument (1 or 0) here.
>>>>>> Also,
>>>>>> need to specify which command this is valid for, which appears to
>>>>>> be the
>>>>>> module command. Why is this an option for the module command? It
>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> seem to have anything to do with a particular module. Should this
>>>>>> just be
>>>>>> its own command?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> I think it should be just for the modules command.
>>>> Care to explain why? As your usage above shows, the module command is
>>>> for
>>>> adding or deleting modules. This functionality has nothing to do with
>>>> that.
>>>> --dontaudit is for specifying globally that dontaudit's should be turned
>>>> on/off. It's not an option that modifies the behavior of adding or
>>>> deleting
>>>> a module, it's a completely separate thing.
>>>> 
>>> No I don't care to explain why, now that you shot down my idea. :^)
>>> 
>>> I guess it should be a separate command
>>> 
>>> What do you think of.
>>> 
>>> semanage dontaudit -a
>>> semanage dontaudit -d
>>> 
>> 
>> I like it being a separate command since it really is a global thing but
>> the syntax above seems very confusing. Can we depart from the add/remove
>> paradigm for this one and use something more appropriate, like on/off,
>> enable/disable, audit/dontaudit, or something similar?
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
>> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> with
>> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
>> 
>> 
> 
> semanage dontaudit on
> semanage dontaudit off

Sounds great to me.

Chad


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux