On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, David P. Quigley wrote: > Looking more closely at the problem I was mistaken. I was concerned with > the dereferenceing of the dentry in the first line of the getxattr > function but it seems that a precondition for us getting that far is > that we will always have a valid dentry at that point. I'd appreciate it > if the people whose code the patch touches can review the patch again > and either NAK with more comments or sign off on it. Please repost them with a version number so we know exactly which patches we're looking at. -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.