Re: mmap_min_addr and your local LSM (ok, just SELinux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, James Carter wrote:

> Agreed.  That guarantee has been stated from the very beginning for
> SELinux; we shouldn't move away from it.  Are there other places where
> having an LSM weakens security by default?

There's a similar form of hook in vm_enough_memory, but the SELinux module 
calls the DAC capability check first, so it seems ok from a policy 
writer's point of view (i.e. worst case is they revert to DAC).



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux