Re: [RFC] Install SELinux policies from rpm package header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/10/09 4:26 PM, "Joshua Brindle" <jbrindle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> From: James Carter [mailto:jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> 
>>> Its alot worse than that. What about files on backup
>> drives? Offline drives?
>>> transient files that will get relabeled to something inappropriate?
>>> I'm not confortable relabeling databases with potentially sensitive
>>> data to var_lib_t because mysql was uninstalled.
>>> 
>> 
>> The argument seems to be for removing the ability to remove modules.
>> It would be the roach motel style of policy management.
>> 
> 
> I like it, policies check in but don't check out. I haven't heard an
> argument about 1) how I'm crazy and wrong or 2) how to keep systems
> running as expected otherwise though.

There's certainly a case for leaving all policy installed. Policy is
configuration data, which RPM also leaves installed when removing packages.
We could easily treat policy the same.

Chad


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux