On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:40 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 21:27 +0200, Jiří Paleček wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:07:38 +0200, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > >> Stephen, > > >> > > >> Would you like to say something about the following Patch ? > > > > > > Yes, it breaks the selinux testsuite for me. Please revert. > > > > How exactly does it break it? > > Running it via test_selinux.sh was generating errors like: > cd: /testcases/bin: No such file or directory > in selinux.outfile, producing a couple bogus FAILs. > > After backing out your setcurrent change and your SELINUXTMPDIR changes > and Chris' patch and running it via test_selinux.sh, I'm down to 6 > remaining FAILs, likely due to further tightening of refpolicy since we > last updated the test policy. I'll have to go through them one by one > and examine the exact denials and error messages. Ah, 5 of the 6 were just due to not running mcstransd. Need to eliminate that as a dependency. Last FAIL is ioctl, and that one is expected - kernel ioctl checking changed and no one rewrote the test yet. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
