Now it in PECL repository:
http://pecl.php.net/package/selinux
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/selinux/
The php-pecl-selinux package is under review-requesting:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488185
It is necessary the package to be reviewed whether the specfile
correctly follows Fedora packaging guideline [1] [2], or not.
I would like folks to help reviewing it.
In addition, Fedora Project requires all the new packages
to be approved by core maintainers called as "sponsor" [3].
Could you introduce me an appropriate person to recommend
the package?
Thanks,
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP
[3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager/*/sponsor
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Joshua Brindle wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel J Walsh [mailto:dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx]
I would rather package this up as part of libselinux, perhaps
libselinux-php, rather then make a new package.
The last time I used PHP (admittedly years ago) most if not all bindings
were included in the upstream PHP distribution.
At least, most of PHP extensions has php-* naming convension, like:
php-mysql, php-mbstring, php-ldap, ...
Most of major extensions are distributed as subpackages of php itself,
but some of extensions are not distributed as separated package.
(Please find php-* on the list of Fedora SRPMs.)
I don't think we need to wait for it get merged into the core PHP,
to release php-selinux package.
Thanks,
Ok then fine leave it as a separate package.
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
