Quoting Eric Paris (eparis@xxxxxxxxxx): > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:55 -0800, James Morris wrote: > > These patches remove calls to secondary_ops where there is no > > real capability hook, and a couple of SELinux hooks which only > > called these noop hooks. > > > > (Following this, the noop capabilities hooks should also be removed). > > > > Please review. > > > > James Morris (18): > > selinux: remove unused bprm_check_security hook > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to bprm_committing_creds > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to bprm_committed_creds > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to sb_mount > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to sb_umount > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_link > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_unlink > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_mknod > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_follow_link > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_permission > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to inode_setattr > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to file_mprotect > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to task_create > > selinux: remove unused cred_commit hook > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to task_setrlimit > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to task_kill > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to unix_stream_connect > > selinux: remove secondary ops call to shm_shmat > > For the entire series EXCEPT #9 inode_follow_link: > Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> Yup, all looks reasonable, except for the wrong patch attached to the mprotect description :) Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> fwiw... -serge -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
