On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Eric Paris wrote: > From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > SELinux has long been calling wake_up_interruptible() on > current->parent->signal->wait_chldexit without holding any locks. It > appears that this operation should hold the tasklist_lock to dereference > current->parent and we should hold the siglock when waking up the > signal->wait_chldexit. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx> This seems correct to me, too, although I'll just push it to security-testing#next at least for the moment so it gets some testing. How did you find this issue? -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
