On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:08 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:05 -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > Do others have thoughts? > > Seems similar to the vm_enough_memory() case, where we likewise > introduced a separate security hook that internally checks without > auditing. > > The OOM killer likewise ought to be using a non-auditing form of > capability checks. So would you suggest a generic non-auditing capability checking mechanism or a specific hook for "things to use" * capable_noaudit(current, cap) * security_capable_noaudit(current, cap) * security_cap_sys_resource(current) Looks like oom also checks CAP_SYS_ADMIN so maybe a generic cap interface would be best. esandeen: I still think it would be a good idea to simplify ext4_claim_free_blocks() and ext4_has_free_blocks() which seems to have a lot of code duplication and both have the unconditional capable calls... -Eric -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
