On Oct 15, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:02 -0500, Joe Nall wrote:
Is it legitimate to define a type within an optional_policy within a
template?
Yes.
I ask because there are a number of compile issues with policy that
look like:
template(`wm_domain_template',`
...
optional_policy(`
dbus_system_bus_client_template($1_wm,$1_wm_t)
# does not compile
# dbus_user_bus_client_template($1,$1_wm,$1_wm_t)
')
...
')
I can't reproduce this by just adding it to a random module; there are
likely more factors that just the above template calls.
Using stock Fedora targeted policy:
policy_module(swo,1.0.0)
userdom_unpriv_user_template(swo)
dbus_chat_user_bus(swo,swo_t)
joe
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
