Re: [refpolicy] Milter Mail Filters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:27 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Updated patch: sendmail, when run as "newaliases", tries to getattr() milter sockets as well as the directories they live in, so I changed the milter_getattr_all_data_dirs interface to milter_getattr_all_sockets.

I also moved the call to this interface in mta.te out from the middle
of a bunch of postfix-related lines.

Paul.

I think my last two comments are

* you can't require milter_port_t.  It doesn't seem like a generic port
type would be useful anyway, otherwise there would be a port defined.

So I should change "allow milter_$1_t milter_port_t:tcp_socket name_bind;" to "corenet_tcp_bind_generic_port($1_milter_t)"?

I can do that but I don't understand why milter_port_t should be any different than say stunnel_port_t, which also doesn't have a default port defined, and would be used in a similar way, i.e. an admin would set up an application to use a specific port (a milter running over tcp needs to have a port specified, just a tunnel set up using stunnel does - they don't just bind to random generic ports).

* milter vs milters inconsistency of naming

I'll rename the module and the file to milter then, though I'd hoped that "milter" would have been accepted as an abbreviation of "milters".

* derived types should have the prefix first, eg, $1_milter_t not
milter_$1_t.

I'll change those.

Paul.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux