Re: [RFC PATCH v6 04/16] selinux: Better local/forward check in selinux_ip_postroute()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 30 September 2008 9:43:12 pm James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Paul Moore wrote:
> > It turns out that checking to see if skb->sk is NULL is not a very
> > good indicator of a forwarded packet as some locally generated
> > packets also have skb->sk set to NULL.  Fix this by not only
> > checking the skb->sk field but also the IP[6]CB(skb)->flags field
> > for the IP[6]SKB_FORWARDED flag.  While we are at it, we are
> > calling selinux_parse_skb() much earlier than we really should
> > resulting in potentially wasted cycles parsing packets for
> > information we might no use; so shuffle the code around a bit to
> > fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> (Wow, this code is getting complex... :-)

Yeah, it is pretty surprising too (at least to me anyway).  I beginning 
to think our common case is the existence of corner cases :)

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux