On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:05:59 am Paul Moore wrote: > On Tuesday 02 September 2008 8:48:41 pm Paul Moore wrote: > > Since I'm reasonable certain there are no really nasty regressions, > > I've added sign-offs to all the patches now. I expect there will > > probably be another spin or two to take care of bugs yet to be > > found and fix other various things that pop-up (maybe even the > > Smack stuff if I can find the time) but the patches are in > > reasonably good shape right now. I also did a test merge/compile > > with the September 2nd linux-next tree and there were no nasty > > surprises so I'm also pushing these patches to my lblnet-2.6_next > > tree which means you should see them in tomorrow's linux-next tree > > if all goes well. > > Just an FYI, it looks like I may have missed the cut for the > September 3rd linux-next tree. The patches should be in there for > tomorrow's tree. ... another quick update, I just verified that the patches are included in the September 4th linux-next tree so if you are feeling particularly adventurous you can try testing that tree as well (be warned, it will likely be much less stable than the lblnet-2.6_testing tree due to the high degree of flux). -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
