Re: [PATCH -v2] SELinux: memory leak in security_context_to_sid_core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:26 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 10:08 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 09:58 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > Fix a bug and a philosophical decision about who handles errors.
> > > 
> > > security_context_to_sid_core() was leaking a context in the common case.
> > > This was causing problems on fedora systems which recently have started
> > > making extensive use of this function.
> > > 
> > > In discussion it was decided that if string_to_context_struct() had an
> > > error it was its own responsibility to clean up any mess it created
> > > along the way.  Remember that it is perfectly safe to call
> > > context_destroy() on the same context twice and so this will not
> > > introduce any double frees or cause issues with the other change.
> > 
> > Well, there are two possibilities.  Either:
> > 1) we are fine with multiple calls to context_destroy(), in which case
> > the original patch stands as is, or
> 
> I'm fine with it standing, but I rewrote it really because I didn't want
> yet another needless goto that I added.
> 
> > 2) we want to avoid multiple calls to context_destroy(), in which case
> > this patch is still wrong - the latter context_destroy() call should
> > only occur _before_ the out label (i.e. same place it was, only without
> > the conditional).
> 
> Lets go this route just to have some consistency.  I put it where I did
> so it was done without the policy_rwlock.  Since we are now seeing
> hundreds to thousands of calls to this code path I think its worth it to
> be a slight bit more picky with the locking.  So how about a version 3
> like this?  If you ack I'll send it cleanly for jmorris....

I'm not sure it is justified - we are only talking about a readlock
there, and centralizing the lock/unlock sequence seems generally good.

> 
> ---
> 
>  security/selinux/ss/services.c |   12 +++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> index b52f923..a0a73e7 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> @@ -811,11 +811,12 @@ static int string_to_context_struct(struct policydb *pol,
>  	/* Check the validity of the new context. */
>  	if (!policydb_context_isvalid(pol, ctx)) {
>  		rc = -EINVAL;
> -		context_destroy(ctx);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  	rc = 0;
>  out:
> +	if (rc)
> +		context_destroy(ctx);
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> @@ -865,13 +866,14 @@ static int security_context_to_sid_core(const char *scontext, u32 scontext_len,
>  		context.str = str;
>  		context.len = scontext_len;
>  		str = NULL;
> -	} else if (rc)
> +	} else if (rc) {
> +		read_unlock(&policy_rwlock);
>  		goto out;
> +	}
>  	rc = sidtab_context_to_sid(&sidtab, &context, sid);
> -	if (rc)
> -		context_destroy(&context);
> -out:
>  	read_unlock(&policy_rwlock);
> +	context_destroy(&context);
> +out:
>  	kfree(scontext2);
>  	kfree(str);
>  	return rc;
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux