Re: [PATCH]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My main goal here is to get labeled-nfs in to mainline in chunks instead
of throwing massive 25+ patch sets at you later on. People are far less
likely to review patch sets when they are massive so I figured a series
of smaller chunks would attract more attention. I have no problem
working off of a labeled-nfs tree with this patches applied to it but
I'd like to avoid getting stuff reacked every time I post it.

Dave

On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 01:04 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:33:22AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > > Cristoph, Casey -- any chance of getting ack or nack on this before the 
> > > merge window closes?
> > 
> > No concernes about this patch, but as usual strong objections against
> > introducing it without the actual user.
> 
> Ok, we might put them into a labeled-nfs tree rather than pushing them to 
> mainline at this stage.
> 


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux