Re: [refpolicy] RFC: hal_read_log interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 11:55 -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:52 -0400, rob myers wrote:
> > While trying to create a domain that could read all the files
> > in /var/log, I noticed that hald_log_t files do not have the logfile
> > attribute.  This appears to be intentional because the
> > logging_log_filetrans interface was used instead of the logging_log_file
> > interface.  Is this still the intention?
> > 
> > Attached is a patch to add an interface to allow domains to read
> > hald_log_t in case hald_log_t needs to remain a private type.
> 
> The filetrans interface is needed so that when hal creates it's log
> in /var/log, it gets the correct type.  It should also have the log_file
> interface too, since its a log file.  I changed hald_log_t to be a log
> file.

If hald_log_t is a log file, then I no longer need my proposed
hal_read_log interface.  If anyone else desires that interface let me
know and I would be glad to clean up the patch and resubmit.

Thanks,

rob.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux